Neil Gaiman Lawsuit: Author Denies Ex-Nanny’s Rape Allegations, Calls Claims ‘Outrageous’
In a court brief filed in Wisconsin federal court on Tuesday, Gaiman’s defense attorneys have requested the case’s dismissal, stating that U.S. courts have no legal standing over events that allegedly occurred in New Zealand. Pavlovich, a citizen of New Zealand, claims she was repeatedly raped by Gaiman while serving as a live-in nanny for his son in 2022.
Gaiman’s legal team argues that the Neil Gaiman lawsuit should be dismissed due to jurisdictional issues. They emphasize that New Zealand has its own legal avenues that Pavlovich should have pursued before filing in the United States. Additionally, they highlight the logistical challenges of gathering evidence and witness testimonies from a location 8,296 miles away from the Wisconsin federal court.
“The vast majority of non-party witnesses and evidence are in New Zealand,” Gaiman’s attorneys noted. They also stressed that litigating in the U.S. would impose unnecessary burdens on the discovery process, making it difficult to present a fair case.
To further refute the accusations, Gaiman has submitted WhatsApp messages between himself and Pavlovich. While the full conversation remains sealed in court documents, the brief states that these messages demonstrate that their interactions were consensual. According to the filing, Pavlovich not only initiated but also encouraged their relationship.
“At no point in any of Plaintiff’s messages to Gaiman did she ever accuse him of misconduct,” the filing states. “Any suggestion that Gaiman engaged in violent or non-consensual activity is false and defamatory.”
One key exchange allegedly took place on March 24, 2022, when Gaiman confronted Pavlovich after hearing from his wife, Amanda Palmer, that she had accused him of rape.
“Honestly, when Amanda told me that you were telling people I’d raped you and were planning to Me Too me, I wanted to kill myself. But I’m getting through it a day at a time,” Gaiman reportedly messaged Pavlovich.
Pavlovich’s response, according to the filing, was one of shock. “This is the first time I have heard of this,” she allegedly wrote. Two days later, she reportedly followed up with another message stating, “It was consensual — how many times do I have to tell everyone?”
The couple, who have been publicly open about their unconventional marriage, have maintained that the accusations against them are entirely baseless. Palmer’s legal team is expected to file a separate motion for dismissal.
Legal experts suggest that while high-profile lawsuits can impact a celebrity’s career, the outcome will depend on whether the case proceeds or is dismissed. If the lawsuit is thrown out due to jurisdictional issues, it may not cause lasting damage to Gaiman’s public image. However, if further evidence surfaces, it could pose a significant challenge to his legacy.
Gaiman’s legal team is currently awaiting a court ruling on their motion to dismiss. If the Wisconsin federal court rules in favor of dismissal, Pavlovich may have to pursue legal action in New Zealand instead.
Meanwhile, supporters and critics continue to debate the implications of the case. Some believe the allegations should be fully investigated, while others argue that false accusations can be damaging to public figures. The legal battle will likely take months to resolve, with both parties prepared for a lengthy court process.